Skip to the interactive AASHTO soil classifier

Geotechnical & transportation engineering

AASHTO Soil Classification Chart

Classify a soil from sieve and Atterberg-limit data, calculate its Group Index, and check the AASHTO M 145 group boundaries.

Standard
AASHTO M 145-91 (2025)
Primary split
35% passing No. 200
Groups
A-1-a through A-7-6

Interactive classifier

Classify Soil Using the AASHTO System

Enter laboratory percent-passing results plus liquid limit and plasticity index. The checker follows the AASHTO left-to-right elimination sequence.

Use measured values for the total sample. The No. 10, No. 40, and No. 200 percentages must decrease or stay equal as sieve opening decreases. LL is not needed when the data resolve to A-1 or A-3; otherwise enter LL to finish the A-2 through A-7 decision. If the fines are reported nonplastic, select Nonplastic rather than entering PI = 0.

Server-rendered reference

AASHTO Soil Classification Groups and Boundaries

A transformed reference summary of the laboratory boundaries used to distinguish the mineral-soil groups A-1 through A-7.

Use the table as a lookup reference, but classify by proceeding from left to right through the group sequence. A single threshold does not establish the final group.

Scroll horizontally to view additional columns and vertically to view additional rows. The group column and headers remain visible while scrolling.

Original Turn2Engineering summary of AASHTO M 145 classification boundaries. Dashes mean the criterion does not control that row; NP means nonplastic.
Sieve analysis — percent passing Fraction passing No. 40 Additional subgroup rule Copy
No. 10 No. 40 No. 200 LL PI
A-1-a Granular ≤ 50% ≤ 30% ≤ 15% ≤ 6% First qualifying group
A-1-b Granular ≤ 50% ≤ 25% ≤ 6% After A-1-a
A-3 Granular ≥ 51% ≤ 10% NP Nonplastic fines
A-2-4 Granular ≤ 35% ≤ 40% ≤ 10% After A-1 / A-3
A-2-5 Granular ≤ 35% ≥ 41% ≤ 10% After A-1 / A-3
A-2-6 Granular ≤ 35% ≤ 40% ≥ 11% After A-1 / A-3
A-2-7 Granular ≤ 35% ≥ 41% ≥ 11% After A-1 / A-3
A-4 Silt-clay ≥ 36% ≤ 40% ≤ 10% >35% No. 200
A-5 Silt-clay ≥ 36% ≥ 41% ≤ 10% >35% No. 200
A-6 Silt-clay ≥ 36% ≤ 40% ≥ 11% >35% No. 200
A-7-5 Silt-clay ≥ 36% ≥ 41% ≥ 11% PI ≤ LL − 30
A-7-6 Silt-clay ≥ 36% ≥ 41% ≥ 11% PI > LL − 30

Scope: mineral soils and soil-aggregate mixtures represented by A-1 through A-7. A-8 peat/muck identification is outside this laboratory checker. The boundary table and the companion description/GI table are original transformed summaries, not reproductions of the AASHTO standard table.

AASHTO group descriptions and Group Index treatment used with the classification boundary table above.
GroupTypical constituent descriptionGroup Index treatment
A-1-aStone fragments, gravel & sandGI = 0
A-1-bStone fragments, gravel & sandGI = 0
A-3Fine sandGI = 0
A-2-4Silty/clayey gravel & sandGI = 0
A-2-5Silty/clayey gravel & sandGI = 0
A-2-6Silty/clayey gravel & sandA-2-6/7 GI equation
A-2-7Silty/clayey gravel & sandA-2-6/7 GI equation
A-4Silty soilsGeneral GI equation
A-5Silty soilsGeneral GI equation
A-6Clayey soilsGeneral GI equation
A-7-5Clayey soilsGeneral GI equation
A-7-6Clayey soilsGeneral GI equation
Table actions

Bulk CSV download is intentionally unavailable because the controlling AASHTO standard is copyrighted.

Functional boundary diagram

Liquid Limit and Plasticity Index Boundaries

The high-LL/high-PI A-7 region is split by PI = LL − 30. A submitted LL/PI point appears after classification.

AASHTO liquid limit and plasticity index boundary diagram Original schematic showing liquid limit 40 percent, plasticity index 10 percent, and the A-7-5 versus A-7-6 boundary PI equals LL minus 30. The horizontal axis runs from 0 to 100 percent liquid limit and the vertical axis from 0 to 70 percent plasticity index. 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 30 50 70 Liquid limit, LL (%) Plasticity index, PI (%) PI ≤ 10 LL ≤ 40 PI > 10 A-7-5 side A-7-6 side PI = LL − 30
Original Turn2Engineering schematic of the LL/PI decision boundaries used for A-2 through A-7 interpretation. The plot shows LL from 0–100% and PI from 0–70%; the classification table and ordered elimination procedure remain controlling.
Your LL
Your PI
LL − 30
A-7 boundary side

How the AASHTO Soil Classification System Works

AASHTO M 145 is a highway-construction classification system. It uses particle-size distribution together with liquid limit and plasticity index to place mineral soils into groups A-1 through A-7. Federal Highway Administration guidance describes A-1, A-2, and A-3 as granular materials and A-4 through A-7 as silt-clay materials.

No. 10 sieve
2.00 mm opening; important to the A-1-a gradation boundary.
No. 40 sieve
0.425 mm opening; used for A-1/A-3 gradation and the fraction on which Atterberg characteristics are evaluated.
No. 200 sieve
0.075 mm opening; 35% or less identifies the granular side of the chart, while more than 35% moves to silt-clay groups.
LL and PI
Atterberg-limit indices used to separate silty versus clayey behavior and low- versus high-liquid-limit groups.

Read the chart from left to right

The procedure is an elimination process. Test A-1-a first, then A-1-b, A-3, the A-2 subgroups, and finally A-4 through A-7. Do not choose a group merely because one column happens to match a single measured value.

AASHTO Group Index formula

The Group Index (GI) supplements the group symbol with a numerical index based on percent passing the No. 200 sieve, LL, and PI.

General Group Index GI = (F − 35)[0.2 + 0.005(LL − 40)] + 0.01(F − 15)(PI − 10)

F is percent passing the No. 200 sieve. NYSDOT guidance states that a negative final GI is reported as zero and the result is rounded to the nearest whole number.

A-2-6 and A-2-7 GI = 0.01(F − 15)(PI − 10)

NYSDOT identifies this reduced expression specifically for A-2-6 and A-2-7. A-1-a, A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, and A-3 have GI = 0 in that public guidance.

Worked AASHTO Classification Examples

Example 1 — A-1-a granular soil

Data: No. 10 = 42%, No. 40 = 25%, No. 200 = 12%, LL = 28%, PI = 4%.

The sample satisfies the first A-1-a limits: No. 10 ≤ 50%, No. 40 ≤ 30%, No. 200 ≤ 15%, and PI ≤ 6%.

Result: A-1-a (GI 0). The sanity check is that classification stops at the first qualifying group.

Example 2 — A-6 silt-clay soil

Data: No. 10 = 100%, No. 40 = 90%, No. 200 = 62%, LL = 38%, PI = 18%.

More than 35% passes No. 200, LL is at or below 40, and PI is above 10, placing the sample in A-6. Using the public NYSDOT GI equation gives 8.89, rounded to 9.

Result: A-6 (GI 9). This classification does not replace strength or pavement-design testing.

Example 3 — exact A-7 subgroup boundary

Data: No. 10 = 100%, No. 40 = 90%, No. 200 = 70%, LL = 50%, PI = 20%.

The sample reaches A-7 and PI equals LL − 30 exactly: 20 = 50 − 30. The equality belongs to A-7-5; only PI greater than LL − 30 is A-7-6.

Result: A-7-5 (GI 14) using the public GI equation and nearest-whole-number rounding.

AASHTO vs USCS Soil Classification

The systems overlap in the laboratory measurements they use, but they are not interchangeable. AASHTO classification is oriented toward highway and subgrade-material grouping, while USCS provides engineering group symbols using different particle-size and plasticity rules.

QuestionAASHTO M 145USCS
Primary transportation useHighway/subgrade classificationGeneral geotechnical description and classification
Fine-material split35% passing No. 200 divides granular from silt-clay sideUses different coarse/fine-grained thresholds and group logic
OutputA-1 through A-7 subgroups plus GISymbols such as GW, SP, CL, MH
Direct conversion?No exact one-to-one conversion should be assumed; classify from the applicable test data in each system.

For the alternate system, use the USCS Soil Classification Chart rather than trying to translate an AASHTO symbol directly.

Common AASHTO Classification Mistakes

Using only No. 200

The 35% boundary chooses the broad granular or silt-clay side; it does not by itself identify the subgroup.

Skipping the left-to-right sequence

A soil that qualifies as A-1 or A-3 should not be reassigned to a later A-2 group simply because it also satisfies later limits.

Treating NP as PI = 0

Nonplastic is a categorical laboratory result. This page keeps NP distinct instead of silently substituting a numeric zero.

Missing the A-7 boundary

A-7-5 includes equality at PI = LL − 30; A-7-6 requires PI to be greater than LL − 30.

Engineering limitation

An AASHTO group or GI is not a CBR, resilient modulus, bearing capacity, shear strength, settlement prediction, or project approval. Detailed design requires the project-specific tests and criteria required by the governing agency and specifications.

Standard Scope, Sources, and Data Rights

Standard basis: AASHTO M 145-91 (2025). Public classification logic was cross-checked against FHWA and NYSDOT guidance on August 15, 2026.

AASHTO M 145 is the controlling commercial standard. This page presents an original transformed educational summary and calculator rather than reproducing AASHTO’s proprietary page layout, standard text, or figures.

Dataset and Source-Check Details

Dataset
AASHTO M 145 mineral-soil boundary summary, A-1-a through A-7-6
Version label
AASHTO M 145-91 (2025) basis
Source checked
August 15, 2026
Publisher
Turn2Engineering
Rights decision
Transformed educational reference; no full-standard reproduction
Download decision
No bulk CSV of the classification matrix
Missing values
— = criterion does not control; NP = nonplastic
Excluded scope
A-8 peat/muck field identification and project-specific design acceptance

AASHTO Soil Classification FAQ

The designations are highway-soil groups based on gradation and plasticity; A-1 through A-3 are on the granular side of the system and A-4 through A-7 are silt-clay groups.

Use the Classification as a Starting Point

The fastest reliable workflow is to enter complete sieve and Atterberg-limit results, confirm the left-to-right group decision, record the GI when applicable, and then continue to the project-specific strength, compaction, drainage, stabilization, or pavement-design checks required by the governing specification.

Scroll to Top